Yesterday, the Institute for Policy Studies published a new report: The True Cost of Billionaire Philanthropy. The findings are alarming – and concerning.
Despite the time and energy the billionaire donor class spends touting their charitable contributions, too many are moving their wealth to donor-controlled intermediaries instead of active charities. They use these donations to enhance their public image, grow political power, and even protect their financial assets.
“Milton Friedman isn’t running the show anymore,” Joe Biden said in a 2020 campaign interview while pledging to greatly scale up public investment. The comment was striking as the University of Chicago economist Milton Friedman represents a branch of economics, the Chicago School, that has dominated fiscal policy in Washington for the last four decades.
Yes, but apparently the new policy stops at the US border
Read the article in The Progressive Magazine
by Jomo Kwame Sundaram
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) for infrastructure and service provision are both costly and risky. Worse, PPPs typically fail to ensure universal, let alone fair access to public amenities.
Public-private partnerships?
PPPs usually involve long-term contractual arrangements in which private businesses provide infrastructure and services traditionally provided by governments. In recent years, PPPs have built or run hospitals, schools, prisons, roads, airports, railways, water and sanitation.
Risk-sharing between public and private sectors has long been widespread. In recent years, more than two dozen different types of PPPs have been identified. Such variations reflect differences in deals between governments and commercial partners.
Continue readingSweden’s much-lauded model of prosperity and social comfort is threatened by a lack of public investment.
Social Europe: Sweden: a social model losing its sheen (socialeurope.eu)
What an interesting question!
See the answer: (10) Do billionaires have a right to exist? – Robert Reich (substack.com)
Claudia Goldin’s Nobel prize puts women’s labour-force participation and the gender pay gap at the centre of economics.
Por Antara Haldar in Social Europe: ‘Women’s economics’ goes mainstream (socialeurope.eu)
If – global – governance wants and needs new resources: tackle global tax evasion!
Read Jayathi Ghosh’s article
The presumption of employment status for ‘gig’ workers has been diluted by the member states in negotiations.
Read in Social Europe: Dangers ahead for the platform-work directive (socialeurope.eu)
This paper puts forward an alternative to the proposed multilateral convention under Pillar One of the BEPS project, by building on and going beyond the progress made so far. A new direction was signalled in 2019 by the G-24 paper proposing a taxable nexus based on significant economic presence, combined with fractional apportionment. The resulting measures agreed under the two Pillars entail acceptance in principle of this approach, and also provide detailed technical standards for its implementation. These include: (i) a taxable nexus based on a quantitative threshold of sales revenues; (ii) a methodology for defining the global consolidated profits of MNEs for tax purposes, and (iii) detailed technical standards for defining and quantifying the factors that reflect the real activities of MNEs in a jurisdiction (sales, assets and employees).
Read the working paper of the South Centre
Yes, says the newly created EU Tax Observatory
Billionaires should face a minimum tax rate, report says – BBC News
© 2025 Global Social Justice
Theme by Anders Noren — Up ↑